ASFA Logo - Bringing Together the Child Welfare Team
Reports
Individual State Responses
Curriculum
Training Guides
Syllabus
Home

APPENDIX B.

COURT IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS POLL - FREQUENCIES

1. How would you rate the child welfare agency staff in terms of their understanding of ASFA requirements? Please rate the understanding on a scale from 1 to 5 with 1 being 'poor' and 5 being 'comprehensive'.

POOR 1 2 3 4 5 COMPREHENSIVE

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
3.00
1
33.3
5.00
1
33.3

Average of the Rating: 4.00

Why did you give them that rating?

N=3

Reasons Frequency Percent
Cannot answer for staff
2
66.7
Understanding is at high level
1
33.3
Want to understand issue complicated
1
33.3

2. Following are some of the skills that supervisors and workers need to have to implement ASFA. Please rate each of these on a scale of 1-5 with one being ‘do not need it’ and 5 being ‘extremely important.’

A. Supervisors?

Ability to develop relationship with court where information is shared

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
3.00
1
33.3
4.00
1
33.3
5.00
1
33.3

Average of the Rating: 4.00

Ability to explain law and requirements to staff

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
4.00
1
33.3
5.00
2
66.7

Average of the Rating: 4.7

Knowledge of the law and requirements

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
4.00
1
33.3
5.00
2
66.7

Average of the Rating: 4.7

Monitor staff to assure time lines are met

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
5.00
3
100

Average of the Rating: 5.0

Ability to set up hearings and court dates

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
3.00
2
66.7
5.00
1
33.3

Average of the Rating: 3.7

Knowledge of gathering information about families for court use

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
3.00
1
33.3
5.00
2
66.7

Average of the Rating: 4.33

How to testify in court regarding permanency and safety planning

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
4.00
2
66.7
5.00
1
33.3

Average of the Rating: 4.33

Ability to identify resources

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
2.00
1
33.3
5.00
2
66.7

Average of the Rating: 3.00

 

B. Workers?

Knowledge of the law and requirements

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
4.00
1
33.3
5.00
2
66.7

Average of the Rating: 4.67

How to testify in court regarding permanency and safety planning

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
4.00
1
33.3
5.00
2
66.7

Average of the Rating: 4.67


Ability to develop relationship with court where information is shared

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
3.00
1
33.3
5.00
2
66.7

Average of the Rating: 4.33

Ability to make decisions quickly

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
3.00
1
33.3
5.00
2
66.7

Average of the Rating: 4.33

Concurrent planning skills

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
4.00
1
33.3
5.00
2
66.7

Average of the Rating: 4.67

Knowledge of gathering information about families for court use

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
4.00
1
33.3
5.00
2
66.7

Average of the Rating: 4.67

Monitor staff to assure time lines are met

DON'T NEED IT 1 2 3 4 5 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
4.00
1
33.3
5.00
2
66.7

Average of the Rating: 4.67

3. In the past year, since our earlier survey, as part of your ASFA implementation have the court and the child welfare agency undertaken or changed any day to day joint activities?______No______Yes If yes, please describe.

N=3

Responses Frequency Percent
Yes
3
100.00
No
0
0.0

N=3

Comments Frequency Percent
Increased collaboration between courts and agencies
2
66.7
Work groups set up to work with case processing issues
1
33.3
Private social workers testifying on child safety
1
33.3
Director of Court Improvement Project on committee for Federal Review
1
33.3
Jurisdictions meeting on regular basis
1
33.3
Staff observing court hearings
1
33.3

A. Has communication changed? Yes or No. If yes, please describe

N=3

Responses Frequency Percent
Yes
3
100.00
No
0
0.0

N=3

Reasons Frequency Percent
Increased communication between court and agency staff
2
66.7
Increased collaboration
1
33.3
More information circulated
1
33.3

B. Are you getting the information you need regarding cases from the agency? Yes or No. If no, please describe.

N=3

Responses Frequency Percent
Yes
2
66.7
No
1
33.3

N=3

Reasons Frequency Percent
Problems getting data, not entered
1
33.3
Need to improve data collection/reporting
1
33.3

4. In the past year, since our earlier survey, has there been any ASFA training for court personnel? If yes, go to 4a. If no, go to 4e.

N=3

Responses Frequency Percent
Yes
2
66.7
No
1
33.3

A. What topics were covered in the training?

N=3

Responses Frequency Percent
ASFA topics incorporated into other training
2
66.7
Permanency planning options
1
33.3
ASFA as related to state case law
1
33.3
Judges presented at Child Welfare Conference
1
33.3

B. Which of the following did you use for staff training on ASFA?

N=3

Reasons Frequency Percent
Conferences
2
66.7
Seminars
1
33.3
Joint training sessions
Meetings
Regularly distributed publications/ bulletins/ newsletters
Presentations on ASFA    
Part of training on other topics    

C. Who did the training?

N=3

Comments Frequency Percent
Consultants
2
66.7
Court Staff
1
33.3
Court Improvement Project personnel    
National conferences    
Attorney    

D. Was the training just on ASFA or is it incorporated into other training that you provide?

N=3

Responses Frequency Percent
Incorporated
1
33.3
Not incorporated
1
33.3

E. In the past year, since our earlier survey, did you do any of the following ASFA training with or for the child welfare agency?

N=3

Reasons Frequency Percent
Joint training
1
33.3
Agency staff invited to some court training sessions
1
33.3
Judges presented at Child Welfare conference
1
33.3
Agency staff invited to judicial training at conference    

F. What were the topics covered in the ASFA training for the child welfare agency?

N=3

Reasons Frequency Percent
Permanency planning options
1
33.3
Final rule how to incorporate into case planning
1
33.3
ASFA as related to state case law
1
33.3
Judiciary role in ASFA implementation
1
33.3
Barriers to successful termination
1
33.3
Ethical issues
1
33.3

G. In the past year, since our earlier survey, have you done any of the following training with or for the agency attorneys?

Reasons Frequency Percent
Joint Training
1
33.3
Agency attorneys invited to some court training sessions
1
33.3
District Attorney handled training
   

H. What were the topics covered in the ASFA training for the agency attorneys?

Reasons Frequency Percent
Permanency planning options
1
33.3
Child development
1
33.3
ASFA as related to case law
1
33.3
Effects of substance abuse
1
33.3
Case planning
1
33.3
Agency unclear about the responsibilities
1
33.3


5. Please rate the importance of the following in terms of working with the child welfare agency as it implements the ASFA requirements, with 1 being ‘not important’ and 5 being ‘crucial.’

Increased Communication

NOT IMPORTANT 1 2 3 4 5 CRUCIAL

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
4.00
1
33.3
5.00
2
66.7

Average of the Rating: 4.67

Having sub-committees that deal with interagency issues

NOT IMPORTANT 1 2 3 4 5 CRUCIAL

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
4.00
2
66.7
5.00
1
33.3

Average of the Rating: 4.33

Having the Director of Court Improvement Projects involved in planning discussions

NOT IMPORTANT 1 2 3 4 5 CRUCIAL

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
4.00
2
66.7
5.00
1
33.3

Average of the Rating: 4.33

Having the Agency's active involvement in the Court Improvement Project

NOT IMPORTANT 1 2 3 4 5 CRUCIAL

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
4.00
1
33.3
5.00
2
66.7

Average of the Rating: 4.67

Good working relationship among court and agency staff

NOT IMPORTANT 1 2 3 4 5 CRUCIAL

N=3

Rating Frequency Percent
4.00
1
33.3
5.00
2
66.7

Average of the Rating: 4.67

 

 

6. Do you see any of the following as barriers to your work with the agency as it implements the requirements of ASFA? (check if 'yes')?

N=3

Response Frequency Percent
Lack of resources: staff, funds, time, etc
2
66.7
Federal and state law not clear on what a permanency hearing is
2
66.7
Lack of understanding of the law
2
66.7
Timelines for TPR are too short, unable to make informed decisions in every case
1
33.3
Lack of understanding of the key stakeholders responsibilities and how they are structured
1
33.3
Agency unclear about there responsibilities
1
33.3

7. Is there anything else that you want to tell us regarding the best way to implement the requirements of ASFA?

N=3

Comments Frequency Percent
Collaboration communication important
1
33.3
CFSR comes first three ASFA goals central CFSR court aspect small
1
33.3
Work together
1
33.3

To Top

>> Continue to the Next Section

Reports
Individual State Responses
Curriculum
Training Guides
Syllabus
Home
Muskie Logo