ASFA Logo - Bringing Together the Child Welfare Team
Reports
Individual State Responses
Curriculum
Training Guides
Syllabus
Home

Module 5: Tips for Using Data to Measure Success

Time
Approximately 3 hours and 15 minutes

Rationale
As a result of ASFA, child welfare managers and supervisors are increasingly expected to be able to use data, information and reports to guide decision making and to determine what is working and what isn't working in the organization, with practice and in the service delivery system. Thus, child welfare supervisors and managers must know how to select, interpret and understand appropriate data to ensure accountability for achievement of assigned outcomes, allocate scarce resources and improve services for children and families.

Learning Objectives
When this module is complete, the participant should be able to:

  • Identify reports that peers find helpful for supervisory and managerial decision making
  • Know how to use some basic data tools for reading and interpreting data
  • Be able to discuss the content of reports in terms of the usefulness of the data and relate the content to outcomes
  • Understand how to use data from reports to monitor the implementation of ASFA and agency goals and outcomes, with a focus on the outcomes he/she and his/her unit is responsible

Activities

  • Exercise: Share helpful reports and ways to use those reports in decision making (30 minutes))
  • Mini-lecture: Ten Tips for Using Reports to Improve Decision Making (10 minutes)
  • Exercise: Hawaii Case Study (45 minutes)
  • Exercise: M & M County (45 minutes)
  • Exercise: Take one or two reports and critique format and content. Ask if and why the data on the report is important, useful and used. Identify what the report is linked to -- safety indicators or finance or budget, for example (20 minutes)
  • Exercise: Look at selected reports that focus on ASFA/agency/unit goals, outcomes and measures or CFSR/PIP and make some comparisons between regions, teams, or units, include reports that relate back to specific (possibly national) performance indicators and/or state plan and are easily accessible by the users (45 minutes)

Sample Materials

  • Reports Helpful to Decision Making (Section II.5.1)
  • Ten Tips for Using Reports to Improve Decision Making (Section II.5.2)
  • Participant’s Version of the Hawaii Case Study, including the case study and attachments (Section II.5.3)
  • Trainer’s Version of the Hawaii Case Study, including the case study with attachments and suggested answers to key questions (Section II.5.4)
  • Frequency/Percent (Section II.5.5)
  • Averages (Section II.5.6)
  • Pie Chart (Section II.5.7)
  • Bar Chart (Section II.5.8)
  • Sample reports selected by the trainer to form the basis for a discussion of their usefulness and importance (to be handed out at the time of training)
  • Sample reports that support agency outcomes and measures and allow some comparison between units or regions (to be handed out at the time of training)
  • Interpreting data form (Section II.5.9)

Advance Preparation
Make sure flipchart, markers, newsprint pad, overheads, calculators and overhead projector are in the room. If you are going to use them, have copies of the case studies available for all participants.

This module contains two data exercises, the Hawaii Case Study and the M&M County exercise. If the trainer would like to shorten the module, or if one or the other is more appropriate for the group being training, one of the exercises can be omitted

  • The Hawaii case focuses on interpreting data and linking practice to data and outcomes. It includes the standard Trainer’s Instructions supplemented by a Trainer’s Version of the case, which includes the case study with attachments and suggested answers to key questions. Prior to the seminar, the trainer should review the material in this module to determine if he/she needs to create additional training aids to facilitate preparation for and presentation of the material. You will probably want to customize the case by using familiar names, local data and indicators of interest to your agency.
  • The M& M County exercise is an opportunity to practice some basic statistical concepts and ways to apply them when using data and reading reports. The presentation of this exercise should be as informal and humorous as possible. To use the M&M County exercise have a small bag of M&Ms for each group. Make sure each bag has M&Ms of assorted colors.

Collect appropriate samples for the exercises which include a discussion of reports.

Glossary of Terms

Average: the total number of items divided by the number of items.

Bar Chart: a way of presenting numerical information as a series of bars or columns of different lengths.

Comparison: an examination of two or more items to establish similarities and dissimilarities.

Data: a recording of facts, concepts or instructions on a storage medium for communication, retrieval and process by automatic means.

Frequency: the number of times an event occurs.

Legend: An explanatory caption accompanying a map, chart, or illustration.

Mean: the arithmetic mean, or means, of a set of measurements is the sum of the measurements divided by the total number of measurements.

Median: the median of a set of numbers is defined to be the middle value when the numbers are arranged in order of magnitude.

Mode: the mode of a set of numbers is the value that occurs most often (with the highest frequency).

Percent: one part in a hundred; tells how many out of 100. For example, 5% = 5 out of 100.

Statistics: the science of assembling, organizing, and analyzing data, as well as drawing conclusions about what the data means.

Bibliography and Suggested Reading
Abuse on the Increase in Cascadia County. (January 2000) Data Users Group of the Oregon Department of Human Services, Salem, OR. Source: Using Information Management to Support the Goals of Safety, Permanency and Well Being, http://www. muskie.usm.maine.edu/SACWIS

Inmon, W.H., Zachman, J.A., and Geiger, G. (1997) Data Stores, Data Warehousing and the Zachman Framework: Managing Enterprise Knowledge. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Milewski, Emil G. (1989) The Essentials of Statistics I. Piscataway, NJ: Research and Education Association.

Smoothey, Marion. (1993) Let's Investigate Statistics. North Bellmore, NY: Marshall Cavendish Corporation.

Sperling, A.P. and Levinson, Samuel D. (1998) Arithmetic Made Simple. Revised edition. New York, NY: Doubleday.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (November 2000) Rethinking Child Welfare Practice Under the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Weinbach, Robert W. and Grinnel, Richard M., Jr. (1991) Statistics for Social Workers. 2nd edition. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing Group.

Williams, Edward. (1989) Arithmetic the Easy Way. 2nd edition. Hauppuage, NY: Barron's Educational Series, Inc.

Trainer's Instructions

1. Introduce the module by presenting the rationale and objectives. Refer to the ‘Theme’ flipchart and highlight the theme covered in this module: increasing reliance on data and reports to support decision making.

2. Begin the module using the following as a guide:

Throughout this training we have been discussing how ASFA has led to increased use of outcome-based management in child welfare. Outcome-based, or results oriented management as it is sometimes called, is a management approach which relies on data, information and reports to determine if an outcome has been met or not. Even before ASFA, child welfare organizations collected data and used it to measure success. One of the major, fairly recent changes in child welfare is that now data can be collected by and stored in computers. On the national level ASFA requires that states report using data obtained from the big national systems -- AFCARS (Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System) and NCAANDS (National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System). In addition, most states use a version of the SACWIS (State Automated Child Welfare Information System), or some other statewide system to collect case data and other information. The data collected can be used to compare how states, or units or regions in a state are doing in meeting outcomes. The data can be used to identify successes and areas that might need improvement. The material that is produced for each measure comes from the individual pieces of data that are entered in the system.

There is no question that plenty of data is available. All data is not equally important, however. As W.H. Immon said in the book, Data Stores, Data Warehousing and the Zachman Framework, 'One of the keys to success for modern corporations is access to the right information at the right time at the right place in the right form'.

Individual pieces of data in a database mean nothing. People must decide what pieces of data are important to them, know how to retrieve them then analyze them to determine in what ways they can be useful. The computer can't do this procedure alone. It still requires human intervention. The challenge for child welfare managers and supervisors is not only to select the applicable data but to know how to use this data effectively.

For example, a child welfare supervisor is getting reports from her caseworkers that it is very difficult to find substance abuse treatment programs for the parents of children in care. Using reports from her computer system, she learns, that indeed there are several families affected by the lack of substance abuse facilities. She notices also that some of the children in these families have been in foster care for close to six months. Clearly it is time to take action.

At a unit meeting, she discusses the situation with the caseworkers. They suggest that possibly the agency could approach the few substance abuse providers in the area and find out if by prioritizing the cases, some of those close to deadlines could be addressed first. The supervisor works on this and also suggests to her manager that a vigorous effort should be made to get more substance abuse facilities in the area. She uses the data she downloaded from her computer to show her unit's need. From her supervisor she learns that other supervisors have identified similar problems. They decided that aggregate data can be used to work on the regional or state level to address the problem.

This example is just an illustration of how data and reports can be used to improve services for children and families. I am sure many of you have found yourselves in a situation where the data you have can be organized to support your position and solve a problem.

3. Transition to the next exercise using the following as a guide:

Let's discuss for a moment the reports that each of you need to perform your own job. Look at Overhead Section II.5.1. It asks you to describe two reports that you use in your job or if you don't use any reports, two reports that you wish you had. On handout Section II.5.1 fill in the blanks for each of these reports, list one way that you use each of these reports that you would be willing to share with the group.

4. Give the group five minutes, then ask for volunteers to share the name of the reports used most frequently and how they use the reports in decision making. During each presentation of a helpful report, probe to ensure that:

  • the title/name of the report is mentioned
  • why and how it works is discussed, and
  • the benefits are mentioned.

Encourage participants to ask questions of their colleagues about each presented report to see if others can benefit from using the report. Determine if there reports mentioned by the managers are different or the same as those mentioned by the supervisors.

5. Sum up the exercise using the following as a guide:

In all these instances it's the data you have that allows you to form a basis for decision making and action. Using data, provides the support for outcome based management that is so critical to today's child welfare organization. Supervisors and managers thus must constantly ensure that their day to day work effort is responsive to an outcomes approach both at the case and the agency level. This may involve learning or enhancing skills in planning, managing for results and evaluating performance. The traditional focus on compliance with procedures in assessing program performance is no longer the model. Instead, we must move to results oriented, outcome based management practices in the child welfare system that are aimed at increasing accountability and attention to service performance. This approach puts new emphasis on responsibility, accountability, effectiveness, and results, both for child welfare agencies and families.

6. Continue the discussion using the following as a guide:

Here, in no priority order, are some tips you might find helpful as you think about using data, information and reports to improve decision making. These tips are summarized on handout Section II.5.2.

  • Assure and constantly look to improve the quality of the data
    If you have inaccurate, incomplete, unreliable, untimely data in your system, you will have that same lousy data on your reports. Managers need to add to their list of things to check in on data quality issues…things like sponsoring data quality reviews, allowing time for data clean-up and building procedures that support user responsibility for entering accurate, timely data into the system.
  • Develop priority performance areas, create reports that measure performance in the target areas and distribute the reports to all levels of the agency
    Don't attempt to meet every identified report need immediately. Identifying the management priorities, communicating the priorities and then phasing in the rollout of reports on those monitoring the achievement of the priorities will help assure that the reports are used.
  • Create statewide, regional, area and team versions of key reports -- consider developing both summary and detail versions of reports based on user requirements
    All users do not need to see the same reports. To act on the info in the report, some users need all of the details others only need summary info. Users need to see information that is most directly relevant to them and that they recognize.
  • Use data on reports in day to day management, set policy and inform decision making; incorporate review of key reports in staff meetings
    The message here is USE the reports; don't just create them. Pick one or two reports that identify priority data and discuss them at regularly scheduled staff meetings. Ask questions about why the data is showing what it shows, discuss progress, agree on next steps either to continue good progress or improve progress.
  • Avoid the 'gotcha' syndrome
    This is very much related to the use of reports. Don't have every discussion about data be negative…we missed the mark here, why did we fail to meet the goals? Why are we behind in our recruitment of foster homes? Why are you so far behind your colleagues in…whatever? Instead, use the reports to ask informed questions, focus management, supervisory and staff attention on a particular issue or series of issues, identify barriers to success as well as highlight where success has been achieved. You may want to think about something as simple as developing some reports that give both exceptions and positives. In other words, why can't you design reports that say 85% of our assessments were completed on time and also say, thus 15% of our initial assessments are overdue? This method highlights both the done on time as well as the overdue. Too often, reports just give the 'exceptions'…what did not meet the target.
  • Ensure that reports are distributed to the appropriate people
    This goes with out saying but it's harder than it seems to develop a consistent, reliable, up to date report distribution list and system.
  • Establish an open, user driven report requirement process that responds to user requests for information, manages expectations, prioritizes requests and takes frequency of reports into consideration
    States are finding that users will ask for the world but in reality can only focus on and effectively use so much data at a time. Setting up a process for prioritizing report requests, can help shape user expectations, keep a focus and assure that real (vs. perceived) data needs are met.
  • Devote resources to meeting data clean up and report development, assurance and maintenance efforts
    The resource needs won't disappear once your system is live in fact, they probably will only increase as users get more and more comfortable analyzing data.
  • Provide training to all staff on how to read and use reports
    Don't assume that report reading is intuitive, it's not. Some of the staff who, are now looking at reports haven't read a graph or chart for several years and may have not used data analysis skills for at least that long. Just as people needed to be taught why they needed to use the SACWIS system and how to read the screens and where to find key data in the system, they will need that type of instruction on reports.
  • Develop both on-line and hardcopy reports -- consider a data warehouse for user defined and canned ad hoc reports
    This is an interesting solution to the issue we just discussed about the need to devote resources to designing and using reports. Some states that are struggling to keep up with user access requests have set up a series of canned, pre-defined reports, let users fill in some specific query info, like dates or region etc. and then produce their own reports. Some professions, like finance, actually let users have access to the whole data base and train them on how to create and run their own reports independent of any support.

7. Introduce the Hawaii Case Study using the following as a guide:

As a child welfare supervisor or manager you are increasingly being asked to understand how to use data from reports to monitor the implementation of ASFA and agency goals and outcomes with a focus on the outcomes for which you are responsible. The Hawaii case provides us an opportunity to link data, practice and outcomes.

8. Pass out copies of the Participant’s Version of the Hawaii Case Study (Section II.5.3). Ask the participants to go into their small groups, take a few minutes to read the case study and then begin to answer the questions. Ask that a recorder be named who will report back to the large group. Give the group 20 minutes to work on the answers.

9. After 20 minutes, bring all the participants back together and begin to gather the small group reports by asking one group to summarize the case situation. Then ask another group to report how it answered question 1. Process the response with the whole group and then continue on to questions 2 and 3.

10 Wrap-up the activity using the following as a guide:

In the case study, you just read through and interpreted data from several table and linked that data to outcomes and practice. Lets now look at some real reports and see what they tell us.

Does anyone have any questions before we move on to the next topic in this module?

11. If you are going to use the M & M County exercise instead of the Hawaii Case Study begin with this introduction.

Even though you, as a child welfare supervisor or manager may not need to analyze data, you probably will encounter situations on the job when you will find it helpful to have some knowledge of basic data analysis and the way that data is used. In fact, many supervisors and managers may find that they need to use data analysis skills on a regular basis in their job.

What are statistics anyway? One definition is the science of assembling, organizing, and analyzing data, as well as drawing conclusions about what the data means. Sounds interesting doesn't it? However, people's ideas about statistics vary. For example, one author (Smoothey) reports, "People are sometimes suspicious about statistics". A British Prime Minister, Disraeli, is believed to have said to Queen Victoria,"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics." Or, as someone else said, "Statistics are like a bikini; shows a lot, but hides the interesting."

This exercise provides a look at some statistical terms and concepts. The data we will use comes from M & M County. You know that because we will use M & M's to illustrate the material, and when we are done, you can eat the M & M's.

12. Divide the group into small groups of 4-5 people. Ask each group to locate handout Section II.5.5, give each group a package of M&M's and have each group select one person to record the data on the appropriate tables. Note that each M&M represents a child with a permanency goal. The color indicates what kind of goal it is, i.e., reunification, placement with relative, adoption, etc. Continue:

In your jobs you probably will not spend much time counting M & M's so let's imagine that each M & M represents one child with a permanency goal and that each color represents what the goal is - reunification, placement with relative, adoption, etc. Counting the number of children with permanency goals and the kind of goals they have is something child welfare supervisors and managers are apt to do.

Now open the bag and count the total number of M & M's that you have. Record your total on the sheet in the designated place.

Then count the number of M&M's that you have by color. Record that data in Table 1 under the column headed Frequency. Frequency is the number of times an event occurs. So, you can say that the number of red M&M's you have is the frequency of red M&M's. Remember that red = reunification so that the number of red M&M’s represents the number (or frequency) of children with the permanency goal of reunification. Write on Table 1 the number of each color M &M's that you have in the appropriate place.

13. When the group has finished, continue:

The information you have collected so far is your data. After you collect your data you have to organize and summarize it and see what conclusions you can draw from it. Data can be organized in various ways. One way of organizing data is to put the data in tables as we have done here. The frequency of each color M&M lets us compare the number of the colors we have, or the number of children that have various kind of permanency goals.

Another way to compare the number of M&M's that we have is by determining what percent of each color we have. You may remember percent from back in grade school. Percent answers the question 'how many out of 100?' So to find out what percent of the total that each color represents, you have to use the following formula.

Total number of each color of M&M's * 100 =
Total number of M&M's

So everyone go ahead and calculate the percent of each color of M&M's the group has and record it on Table 1 on Handout Section II.5.5. When everyone is finished, ask the group if they think using percents make it easier or harder to compare the number of M&M's they have, or the children on a caseload with different permanency goals.

14. Ask one group to give you their numbers and write them on a flipchart. What does that table tell you now? If this data represented the children on a caseworkers' caseload, what might the supervisor learn from the table? Can any conclusions be drawn from this data? What else would you like to know about this data?

15. Continue:

Another way of describing what you have done (create a frequency distribution) is by using what is commonly known as an "average." In statistics "averages" are called "measures of central tendency." By using them we can make a reasonable estimate of the total population.

Using the M &M's again, let's look at an example of an average.

16. Show Overhead Section II. 5.6. Ask the group to find the corresponding handout in their packets. Ask each group how many of each color M&M's they have and record their responses on Overhead/handout Section II. 5.6. Then ask someone to add the responses and divide that number by the number of groups you have. Explain that the answer you get is the average of the number of each color M&M's that we have.

17. Continue:

Using information from the same legend that we used before. Each M & M represents a child with a permanency goal. Each color represents how that goal will be achieved. If you are looking at the status of children with permanency goals in your team’s caseload, what would this table tell you? How could you use this information?
Could you use this information to compare your unit, or office with another?

There are two other measures of central tendency that are sometimes used. One is the mode which is the value in a set of numbers that occurs most often (with the highest frequency). The mode is not used as frequently as the median and the mean because it is not as precise. The other measure of central tendency is the median. In a set of numbers it is defined as the middle value when the numbers are arranged in order of magnitude. The median is the most stable measure, meaning it is least affected by extreme values occurring in the distribution.

Another way of presenting data is to use charts. Sometime this method is more effective than using a table.

18. Show overhead Section II.5.7 and ask the group to find the handout that shows this overhead in their packets. You can use the circle on overhead Section II.5.7 to make a Pie Chart. Using the percentage information they have calculated in Table 1, have each group draw in the approximate percentage for each way to achieve the permanency goal.

Ask the group if this chart would be a good way to compare permanency goals? Is it easier to understand than a table? What makes it an effective way to present data?

19. Then continue:

Or, you can present data in a bar chart. Look at Overhead Section II.5.8. Using the graph form, draw in how each group's data would look displayed in this manner. Be sure to label your axis and draw a scale. Make sure the legend on the chart represents the ways to achieve the goal of permanency (not the colors of the M & M's).

Note that in the examples the frequencies are represented in the bar chart and the percentages in the pie chart. Does this arrangement work is displaying these two kinds of data?

20. When everyone is finished, ask if there are any questions; then finish the exercise.

We have reached the end of the M&M's exercise. I hope you have had some fun learning a little bit about statistics, data collection, and percent. Learning how to run numbers through formulas, while a useful skill to have, is not the main point of this exercise. Rather, the goal was to become familiar with these analytical tools, learn questions to ask about data and see if any of these tools can be applied in your day to day supervision or other operational activities.

And, you can eat the M&M's if you like.

Does anyone have any questions before we move on to the next topic?

Now that you have learned a few data analysis skills, let's look at some real reports and see what they tell us.

21. Distribute one or two sample reports. Ask the participants to look at the reports and launch a discussion by asking them if the
data on the reports is important, useful, and used. If not used, what would be more useful?

22. Distribute the sample reports that focus on ASFA/agency/unit goals, outcomes and measures or the CFSR/PIP and make some comparisons between regions, teams, and units. Ask them to break into their smaller groups to discuss. Show overhead (Section II.5.9) and ask them to answer the questions which are also in their handout packet. Specifically, have the groups 'interpret' the data.

  • What is the data on these reports saying or trying to say?
  • Can you make any conclusions using these figures?
  • Can you see any trends?
  • Do these numbers surprise you? If so, how?
  • What is the connection between your work responsibilities and the data on these reports?
  • Do you think these figures could be misleading in any way? If so, how?

23. After 10 minutes have the group come back together and report on their discussions. Process the feedback from the small groups with the large group.

24. Wrap up the exercise by noting that:

More and more frequently, child welfare supervisors are expected to have basic analytical skills such as reading and interpreting data on reports. Having such skills is another tool that a child welfare supervisor can rely on to support the complex decision making that he/she is called on to perform everyday.

25. Ask for and address questions.

26. Briefly summarize module.

We have covered a lot of material in this module. We talked about how you as supervisors and managers use data; reviewed some basic data analysis tools; analyzed some reports that you use and shared some helpful practices regarding data and reports with the rest of the group. This material won't make you a data expert, but we hope that it will make you feel more comfortable when you need to use data and reports on the job.

27. Introduce the next module, Wrap-up and Evaluation.

 
.

<< Module 4

Module 6 >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The trainer may want to display a flipchart with the words "Data is the question, not the answer," or "Data is not the end, only the beginning," as possible themes for this session.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The trainer's approach to presenting this case will depend on the trainer's assessment of the group's comfort level working with data. Some trainer's might find that this case study works best if the whole group stays together for the entire case.

 

 

 

.

 

Section II.5.1

Reports Helpful to Decision Making


Two reports I use frequently in my job are:

• Report #1

Name of report: ______________________________

Content of report: _____________________________


• Report #2

Name of report: ______________________________

Content of report: ______________________________


A way I use these reports that is most helpful to me in making a decision is:

__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________

 


Section II.5.2

Ten Tips for Using Reports to Improve
Decision Making

1. Assure and constantly look to improve the quality of the data.

2. Develop priority performance areas, create reports which measure performance in the target areas and distribute the reports to all levels of the agency.

3. Create statewide, regional, area and team versions of key reports -- consider developing both summary and detail versions of reports based on user requirements.

4. Use data on reports in day to day management, to set policy and inform decision making; incorporate review of key reports in staff meetings.

5. Avoid the 'gotcha' syndrome; develop both exception and positive reports.

6. Ensure that reports are distributed to the appropriate people.

7. Establish an open, user driven report requirement process that responds to user requests for information, manages expectations, prioritizes requests and takes frequency of reports into consideration.

8. Devote resources to meeting data clean-up and report development, assurance and maintenance efforts.

9. Provide training to all staff on how to read and use reports.

10. Develop on-line and hard copy reports -- consider a data warehouse for user defined and canned ad hoc reports.


Section II.5.3

PARTICIPANT’S VERSION

HAWAII CASE STUDY


The training version of this material was based on a case study, Abuse on the Increase in Cascadia County developed by members of the Data Users Group of the Oregon Department of Human Services. As part of their training for supervisors, the Hawaii Department of Human Services built on the Cascadia case to develop the Hawaii case. We thank both groups for allowing us to share their efforts.

You are a Child Welfare Services (CWS) Supervisor. In reviewing the Statewide CWS Outcomes Report, the Director has noticed that your section is excelling in certain areas, such as low rates of foster care re-entry and low rates of recurrence of child abuse and neglect. She wants to find out if there are lessons that can be learned from your section to improve outcomes in other areas of the state. Your Section Administrator has asked you to explain some of the trends in your unit for her report to the Director. Using the Quarterly Outcomes Report (QOR), she has asked you to address the following questions:

1. What was the section’s rate of recurrence of child abuse and neglect in FY 01? In the first quarter of FY 02? What factors or practices in your unit could explain this decrease?

2. What was the section’s rate of foster care re-entry in FY 01? In the first quarter of FY 02? What factors or practices in your unit could explain this decrease?

Furthermore, the Director has heard about the high rate of substance abuse in child welfare cases in your section’s geographic area. The Governor has promised her $1,000,000 for substance abuse treatment services for child welfare clients if she can demonstrate that there is a need. She is looking to the sections and units to help her present her case.

3. What role has substance abuse played in cases in your unit? What data can you provide to demonstrate this?

In considering responses to these questions, it is important to look at the data critically. The first step is to locate the data that relates to the question and examine it to make sure that it does indeed answer the question. The second step is to determine if there is additional information related to the topic of the question that should be included in the report.

Question 1: (a) What percentage of children in your section had a recurrence of child abuse and neglect in FY 01? In the first quarter of FY 02? (b) How does that figure compare with the national standard? (c) What factors or practices could explain this decrease?

You look at your section’s Quarterly CWS Outcomes Report (QOR) and find data about the number of children with subsequent confirmed CA/N reports in the first table (See Attachment #1).

The numbers themselves, however, don’t tell you much. You expect the total number of subsequent confirmed reports to be greater. You note that reports of threatened harm have been excluded. Nonetheless, you notice that the percentage of subsequent confirmed reports of actual maltreatment appears to be lower in FY 02 when compared to FY 01. What factors could explain this decrease? Record your answers in the box below.

Answers to Question 1

(a) What percentage of children in your section had a recurrence of child abuse and neglect in FY 01? In the first quarter of FY 02


(b) How does the FY 02 figure compare with the national standard?


(c) What factors or practices explain this decrease?

Question 2: (a) What percentage of children re-entered foster within twelve months in FY 01? In the first quarter of FY 02? (b) Does the percentage appear to be increasing or decreasing? (c) How do the percentages compare with the national standard? (d) What factors or practices could explain this decrease?

You look again at your section’s QOR (see Attachment #2). You find data about the number of children re-entering foster care in the second table under Outcome 4.2.

Again, you notice that the percentage of children re-entering care appears to be lower in the first quarter of FY 02 when compared to FY 01. You see that your section has exceeded the national standard. What factors could explain this decrease? You notice that in Outcome 4.1, (Attachment 3) the percentage of children reunified within one year has also decreased. Could there be a relationship? Is there any other information that you think should be included in the report to the Director? If so, note the information in Answer Box #2 below.

Answers to Question 2

(a) What percentage of children re-entered foster within twelve months in FY 01? In the first quarter of FY 02?


(b) How do the percentages compare with the national standard?


(c) What factors or practices could explain this decrease?


(d) Other:


Question 3: Finally, what role has substance abuse played in your unit's cases? What data can you provide to demonstrate this?

You know that substance abuse is a problem. What types of information might you provide to make your case? Is there information that other systems (e.g. the judiciary, DOH) could provide to you?

Decide what answer you would give to the Director’s questions on substance abuse and note your responses in the answer box below.

Answer to Question 3

(a) What role has substance abuse played in cases in your unit? What data can you provide to demonstrate this?

 


NOTE: END OF TRAINER'S VERSION OF HAWAII CASE STUDY


Section II.5.4

 

Attachment 1

Central CWS Section’s Quarterly CWS Outcomes Report, 1st Quarter FY 02

This report presents the Central CWS Section’s performance on the CWS Outcomes for the 1st quarter of FY 02, 7/1/01-9/30/01. National standards are provided for measures that will be used in the upcoming Child and Family Service Reviews. Section administrators and supervisors can use the data below for case review and supervision. NOTE: For CFR Outcomes 1 and 2, data contain only confirmed reports of actual maltreatment (no threatened harm).

Table 1

Outcome 1: Reduce the recurrence of child abuse and/or neglect
Of all children who were victims of confirmed child maltreatment during the report period, what percentage had another confirmed report within six months?
CCWS
Standard
Note: 23 children were victims of confirmed child maltreatment during the report period. Of these 23 children, none had a subsequent confirmed report within 6 months from the initial report.
FY 01
7/00-6/01
3.0%
(4)
6.1% or fewer
FY 02
7/01-9/01
0%
(0)
6.1% or fewer
For Information
CPSS SCREENS: IA14:
Intake # IA/CA22: Client #
CA/CU39: Report Disposition & Determination Date


Attachment 2


Table 2

Outcome 4: Reduce time in foster care without increasing re-entry.

4.2 Of all children who entered foster care during the period under review, what percentage of those children re-enter foster care within 12 months of a prior foster care episode?
CCWS
Standard
Note: 90 children entered foster care during the report period. Of these 90 children
82 (91%) entered care for the first time
5 (6%) re-entered care within 12 months of a previous placement and
3 (3%) re-entered care after 12 months from a previous placement

FY 01
7/00-6/01
9.90%
(42)
8.6% or fewer
FY 02
7/01-9/01
5.5%
(5)
8.6% or fewer
For Information
CPSS SCREENS: CA/CU28: Start & End Dates, Termination Reason
RU10: Counts Removal Episodes Listed
For Action
Five children re-entered care within 12 months of a previous placement. See attached printouts for case, child, and worker details.

 

Attachment 3


Table 3

Outcome 4: Reduce time in foster care to reunification without increasing re-entry.

Outcome 4: Reduce time in foster care to reunification without increasing re-entry.
4.1 Of all children who were reunified with their parents or caretakers at the time of discharge from foster care, what percentage were reunified within twelve months from the time of the latest removal from home?
CCWS
Standard
50 children were reunified with their parents or caregivers during the report period. Of these children
31 (62%) were reunified within 12 months from the time they entered care
17 (34%) were reunified from 12 to 23 months after the time they entered care
1 (2%) were reunified from 24 to 35 months after the time they entered care
0 (0%) were reunified from 36 to 47 months after the time they entered care
1 (2%) were reunified after 48 months from the time they entered care
FY 01
7/00-6/01
79.9%
(163)
76.2% or more
FY 02
7/01-9/01
62.0%
(31)
76.2% or more

 


Section II.5.5

 

M & M County

Frequency/Percent


The total number of M&M's in our package =

Table 1

Color Frequency %
Red    
Blue    
Brown    
Orange    
Yellow    
Turquoise/Green    

Percent = frequency divided by total number of M & M's I have in my package


Permanency Goal Legend

Red = reunification

Blue = placed with fit and willing relative

Brown = adoption

Orange = permanency guardianship

Yellow = planned permanent living arrangement

Turquoise/green = none


Section II.5.6

M & M County

Averages


Table 2

Color Group Frequency Total # of Color Average
Gr.1 Gr.2 Gr.3 Gr.4 Gr.5    
Red              
Blue              
Brown              
Orange              
Yellow              
Turquoise/Green              

Total number of each color divided by the number of groups = the average number of each color, or the average number of children with that permanency goal.

Permanency Goal Legend

Red = reunification

Blue = placed with fit and willing relative

Brown = adoption

Orange = permanency guardianship

Yellow = planned permanent living arrangement

Turquoise/green = none


Section II.5.7


Pie Chart

Ways to Achieve Permanency (%)

example of a pie chart

 

Permanency Goal Legend

Red = reunification

Blue = placed with fit and willing relative

Brown = adoption

Orange = permanency guardianship

Yellow = planned permanent living arrangement

Turquoise/green = none


Section II.5.8


Bar Chart

Ways to Achieve Permanency (%)

example of a bar chart

 

Permanency Goal Legend

Red = reunification

Blue = placed with fit and willing relative

Brown = adoption

Orange = permanency guardianship

Yellow = planned permanent living arrangement

Turquoise/green = none

 


Section II.5.9

 

Interpreting Data

Review the data in the sample reports. What kind of conclusions can you draw. Write the answers to the following questions using the blanks below.

  • What is the data on these reports saying or trying to say?
  • Can you make any conclusions using these figures?
  • Can you see any trends?
  • Do these numbers surprise you? If so, how?
  • What is the connection between your work responsibilities and the data on these reports?
  • Do you think these figures could be misleading in any way? If so, how?

 

<< Module 4 >>>>>> Module 6 >>

Reports
Individual State Responses
Curriculum
Training Guides
Syllabus
Home
Muskie Logo